A Long Thought on Prologues

Around ten years ago I wrote a story that was my first complete mystery novel, the first I had professionally edited, and the first I tried marketing.  It’s been sitting in a computer file since.  I learned a great deal about writing from it, and even more about editing.  And I still love the story.  Since I’m in the middle of a dry period for new stories, I recently pulled this old friend out.  Looking at it from a position of ten years of writing and learning, there are just so many things wrong with this one.  And yet, like the best friend you love in spite of her faults, I still love this story.  So I’ve started playing with it, more to force myself to work with words than anything else, but I realize I’m enjoying renewing acquaintances with old characters.

The first thing I noticed was that  I opened the story with a dream sequence.  Most writers will tell you that’s a symbol of a beginning writer.  After much thought I realized I wanted to impart information about the protagonist’s character, about something that happened to her in her past that now follows her.  And I wanted to do that without giving away current information that would be fed throughout the story.  I chose the clichéd dream.  Reading it I realized I was cheating the reader, dropping them into action, pulling them into involvement with the character, only to yank them back as if saying, ‘Fooled you, it was a dream, you can’t care about this character yet.’

In my current revising, I still want to impart that important background scene, but the dream had to go.  I pulled out my favorite book on writing, Between the Lines, by Jessica Page Morrell, and read her section on prologues and epilogues.  And then I rewrote the dream as a prologue, cutting over half of it out.  Why?  Because as Jessica points out, prologues work best when they are very short.  They also work only when the information in them is vital to the coming story, and yet not part of the story.  If they were integral to the story, then they would happen within the story.  As with this one, I had a specific event that completely changed the way my character thought, acted, and lived.  But my story starts a few years after this event, which is important only because it foreshadows the person she becomes.  Throughout the story the character will respond to an event or act a certain way, and the reader will share that with her, understand why she is who she is, while the characters around her will not.  For me, that adds tension between the characters, but also pulls the reader into the story, allowing them to have something private they share with the protagonist.

I’m not sure if the prologue will meet all those ideas, or even work.  I’ll find that out as I continue to revise.  But for now I like it better than that dream sequence.

So have you used prologues?  Why did you choose that device?  Did it fulfill what you wanted it to?  Any thoughts on prologues?

Cliche Writing Question

I like Yahoo Answers/Books and Authors.  Not only is it fun to read the posted questions and what others have to say, but I also enjoy answering them.  Many are thought-provoking, like the one who asked how you know when your story is finished.  I posted before on that, because at first it seems like a no-brainer to a writer, until you try to explain it. 

Along the same lines is the question many writers receive: where do you get your ideas?  I have seen many people on Answers post either that very question, or a similar one where they post wanting others to give them ideas to write about.  My inclination is to laugh when I hear that question, and I know many authors have a stock answer but really, when I actually give the question some thought, I pause.

It’s not so much where the idea comes from, I think.  It’s not like there’s this secret pot I dip into and pull out something.  I think the question would be more accurate if it was phrased as, what triggers an idea.  For me, it’s another cliché writing question.  What if…

I’ll see an object, or hear a snippet of conversation, or watch an event unfold and think, ‘what if this happened’, or ‘that conversation would have been more interesting if she’d said this’, or ‘wow, he’s lucky that didn’t happen’, and an idea grows from that moment.  So for me, stories arrive from observing life around me and from wanting to twist those observations to make them into a story I’d want to read.  And I think that is true for most writers.  How many times have we told our family members a story about something that happened and found ourselves embellishing to make it funnier or more dramatic?  It’s the same principle.  My husband says he’ll listen to me telling a story and think, ‘I don’t remember that.’  Well, that’s part of being a writer isn’t it?  Creating, embellishing, twisting, combining, and daydreaming.

So like I said, a cliché question can still be interesting to pause and consider occasionally.  What are your thoughts on the mysterious source of imagination?

Plot Conundrum

I love mysteries, both writing and reading them.  I have a host of favorite authors including Elizabeth Peters, Dana Stabenow, Cornelia Read, Carol O’Connell, Sandi Ault, Karen Slaughter, Meg Gardner, etc.  But lately something’s been bothering me and I’m not sure how to handle it from both perspectives of reader and writer.  It’s that climatic moment near the end of the book where there’s a big dramatic event, usually endangering the life of the protagonist, and resulting in discovering and/or catching the antagonist.  This event is then followed by a slower paced conclusion that ties everything together.  Here’s my problem.  I’m getting bored with that climatic event.  Especially in series.  How scared should I get for the protagonist when I know a new book is coming out in a few months?  It’s obvious the character is going to survive, which kills the suspense for me.

Some authors deal with this in unique ways.  Elizabeth George was brave enough to kill off one of her main characters.  Others have the protagonist not survive to live happily ever after, and that character will lose someone or suffer something they then have to deal with in the next book.  Meg Gardner for instance has a main character in a wheel chair, which automatically makes me tense because he’s more vulnerable than your typical hero.  But the ending scene is still beginning to feel like a plot device.  I find I am reading these books because of the strongly written characters, who have become people I care about and want to spend time with rather than because of the plot.

It still begs the question.  How do you keep that climatic scene from eliciting a ho-hum response from the reader?  How do you avoid writing a formula and yet still stay in a genre you love?  I’m not sure that avoiding the whole ending scene would work, either, because then the plot would seem to fade away and I think as a reader I would feel let down even though I’m finding that ending scene to be the least interesting part of a book.  Maybe the solution is to not tie yourself as a writer into a series.  That would then free you up to do whatever you wanted with your characters and the reader won’t assume what the ending is going to be. 

So any thoughts on how to solve this or comments on what you do in your writing to avoid having what should be the most tense, fast paced scene of a book become an expected, boring formula?